Sometimes, I assume that I've blogged about some Db2 for z/OS-related topic when in fact I have not. RPN table spaces is one such topic. In thinking about something to post this month, I briefly considered RPN table spaces and thought, "Nah. I've probably already blogged on that subject, given that it's a big deal." Lo and behold, I haven't blogged about RPN table spaces. I've spoken of them numerous times in presentations over the past few years, but written nothing about them in this blog (save for a brief mention in a 2017 response to a comment associated with an entry on universal table spaces). Time to rectify that situation.
RPN table spaces (I'll explain the acronym in a moment) were introduced with Db2 12 for z/OS (with function level 500 or higher activated). RPN is essentially a new type of universal range-partitioned table space. Before getting into the details, I'll provide a few examples of gripes and concerns that Db2 DBAs have regarding traditional universal partition-by-range (PBR) table spaces:
- "I have a table in a PBR table space that is really big and getting bigger. I'm starting to sweat about only being able to put 16 TB of data in the table. Yeah, I could get up to 128 TB of data in the table if I went with a page size of 32K, but we had good reason to go with 4K pages for this table space."
- "I don't like the fact that my choice for DSSIZE for a PBR table space impacts the maximum number of partitions for the table space. 256G is the DSSIZE we want for a particular PBR table space, but the limit on partitions for the table space would then be 512 - and that only if we go with 32K for the page size (if we go with 4K for the page size and 256G for DSSIZE, I can only have 64 partitions)."
- "Ugh. I have a big table with 1000 partitions in a PBR table space. DSSIZE is 8G, and that has been just fine for 999 of the partitions. One partition is about to hit the 8G size limit. I'm going to have to go to 16G for DSSIZE for THE WHOLE TABLE SPACE, even though ONLY ONE PARTITION NEEDS THE LARGER DSSIZE VALUE."
The RPN table space feature of Db2 12 addresses all of those issues, and more. It does that by way of a very important change versus traditional PBR table spaces. This change pertains to the numbering of pages in a range-partitioned table space. In a traditional PBR table space, every page of the table space has a unique number. In an RPN table space, we number the pages in partition 1, and then for partition 2 we start over again with regard to numbering pages. For partition 3, same thing - start over again with page numbering. Same for partition 4, partition 5, and so on. What this means: if I have an RPN table space with 1000 partitions, the first page page in each and every partition has the same page number (referring to the number stored in the data page itself). You read that right: in the table space, there will be 1000 first-in-the-partition pages that all have the same page number. There will also be 1000 second-in-the-partition pages that all have the same page number (assuming that each partition has at least 2 pages). Does this sound like something that would lead to chaos? In fact there is no chaos because in an RPN table space it is still very much possible to uniquely identify a page. The twist, versus a traditional PBR table space, is that in an RPN table space a page is uniquely identified by the combination of its page number and its partition number. That page numbering scheme is called relative page numbering, and that gives us the acronym RPN (the type of page numbering used for a traditional PBR table space is called absolute page numbering).
OK, so what can I do with an RPN table space that I can't do with a traditional PBR table space? Plenty:
- You can put up to 4 petabytes (that's 4096 terabytes) of data into one table in an RPN table space, and that's true for any page size you choose for the table space.
- Row-capacity-wise, you can put up to 280 trillion rows (yes, that's "trillion," with a "t") into one table in an RPN table space, if you use 4K pages for the table space (if you go with 32K pages, you can put "only" 35 trillion rows into a table in an RPN table space).
- With an RPN table space, you can have up to 4096 partitions of any allowable size - in other words, the limit on the number of table space partitions does not go down as DSSIZE goes up; AND, the maximum DSSIZE is 1024G (versus 256G for a traditional PBR table space); AND, DSSIZE for an RPN table space can be nG, with "n" being any integer between 1 and 1024 (in other words, "n" no longer has to be a power of 2, as is the case for a traditional PBR table space - if you want to go with a DSSIZE of, for example, 131G for an RPN table space, go for it).
- Different partitions of one RPN table space can have different DSSIZE specifications. Consider the scenario I described previously, in which a DSSIZE of 8G is fine for all but one partition in a 1000-partition table space. Let's say the one partition about to hit the 8G size limit is partition 327, and a DBA wants to take DSSIZE for that partition to 17G. With an RPN table space (which makes 17G a valid value for DSSIZE, as noted above), the DBA alters only partition 327 to have DSSIZE 17G; and, get this: that ALTER is an immediate change - partition 327 can immediately get larger than its former 8G DSSIZE, without even a REORG of the partition required to put the DSSIZE change into effect (if the DBA had altered DSSIZE for the partition to a value smaller than the previous value, it would be a pending change and a REORG of the partition would be required to put the smaller DSSIZE value into effect).
- The DSSIZE flexibility provided by an RPN table space extends to partitioned indexes defined on the table in the table space: DSSIZE for partitions of such an index can be nG, with "n" being any integer between 1 and 1024, and different DSSIZE values can be used for different partitions of an index. Speaking of indexes, note that an index on a table in an RPN table space will be slightly larger than an index defined on the same table in a traditional PBR table space. That is so because the size of a RID goes from 5 bytes to 7 bytes when data is in an RPN table space versus a traditional PBR table space.
That's some good stuff, eh? Wanna know how you can have RPN table spaces in your Db2 12 system? I'll tell you. First, for a new table space, in the CREATE TABLESPACE statement you can include the option PAGENUM RELATIVE. You can also create an RPN table space without even specifying PAGENUM RELATIVE. How? By setting the new (with Db2 12) ZPARM parameter PAGESET_PAGENUM to RELATIVE. Doing that will make RPN the default for a new universal PBR table space created in the system (whether PAGESET_PAGENUM is set to RELATIVE or to its default value of ABSOLUTE, that specification can be overridden at the individual table space level via use of the PAGENUM option of CREATE TABLESPACE).
How about an existing universal PBR table space of the traditional variety? Can it be changed to an RPN table space? Yep - just ALTER the table space with PAGENUM RELATIVE, and then do an online REORG of the table space to materialize the change (yes, you have to REORG the table space in its entirety to get to RPN, but the good news is that once the conversion is done you should have fewer situations that would necessitate a REORG of the whole table space - that's part of the RPN value proposition).
Can a "classic" range-partitioned table space be converted to RPN ("classic" referring to a table space that is not universal and is associated with a table that uses table-controlled partitioning versus index-controlled partitioning)? Yes. First, you ALTER the table space with a SEGSIZE specification to indicate that you want to convert it from non-universal to universal PBR (a value of 64 for SEGSIZE is generally appropriate). After that, issue a second ALTER for the table space, this time specifying PAGENUM RELATIVE. After both of those ALTER TABLESPACE statements have been executed, a single online REORG will make the table space both universal and RPN.
If I were administering a Db2 12 system, I think I'd want to make extensive use of relative page numbering for my range-partitioned table spaces, for the DSSIZE flexibility (and the ability to immediately increase a partition's maximum size) and for enhanced scalability. I encourage you to put this new Db2 feature to work for the benefit of your organization.